Article Critique: Teacher
Learning that Supports Student Learning - Linda Darling-Hammond
Over the course of my teaching
career, I have witnessed and participated in a number of discussions
dealing with the professionalism of teachers. Situations like negative
media attention reporting strikes and inadequate teacher education programs
have painted the teacher as less than competent. Darling-Hammond (1998)
talks of teachers as professionals; people who are passionate about
learning for both themselves and for their students. Her article, Teacher
Learning that Supports Student Learning (Darling-Hammond, 1998) raises
the question about what teachers need to know in order to educate "the
most diverse student body in our history to higher academic standards
than ever before" (p. 7). She goes further to state that to achieve
these higher standards, it requires schools to be organized to support
and promote professional improvement for its teachers. It is because
of the authors emphasis on continuous teacher learning that I
chose this article to review.
Like many schools, Netsilik
School suffers from a lack of motivation in our students; northern schools
have the notoriety of high dropout rates and low levels of educational
attainment. Unfortunately, I also see a lack of motivation in teachers
when encouraged to get involved in professional development. Teachers
are learning to cope with their teaching situations but not learning
how to teach well. Darling-Hammond (1998) investigates 1) what teachers
need to know in order to teach to todays standards; 2) the ways
in which teacher learning can be increased to support student learning.
Darling-Hammond (1998) believes
that teachers need to know a number of key things in order to teach
students well. Teachers must understand their subjects extensively so
that they will be able to help students see connections across the curriculum
and with everyday life. Teachers need to understand how children develop
in order to be able to support growth in cognitive, physical, social
and emotional domains. They need to understand differences in culture,
family and intelligences and be sensitive to how these differences affect
learning. Teachers must identify what students believe about themselves
and what they are concerned about so that teachers will be able to motivate
these students to work hard. Teachers must have knowledge about the
various ways students learn and be able to use different strategies
to teach these diversities; they must consider these approaches in the
evaluation and assessment student knowledge. They must understand how
language is learned so that they can create language rich environments
and learning experiences. Teachers must be able to access resources
and technologies that will engage students in the learning process.
They need to know how to structure collaborative interactions between
students, other teachers and parents in order that shared learning can
happen both within the school building and at home. Finally, Darling-Hammond
(1998) emphasises that teachers must be able to analyze and reflect
on their work and be continuously evaluating their students thinking.
This article by Darling-Hammond
(1998) confirms findings from the field of research that has been published
in recent years on brain based learning, multiple intelligences, reflection
and collaboration. It not only gives recommendations about what teachers
need to be know but the author also provides real life examples of how
this learning can be achieved. Darling-Hammond (1998) states:
Teachers learn best by studying,
doing, and reflecting; by collaborating with other teachers; by
looking closely at students and their work; and by sharing what
they see. This kind of learning cannot be divorced from practice
or in school classrooms divorced from knowledge about how to interpret
practice (p. 8).
Much of what is seen in schools
is fragmented learning; connections are not made from the inservice
learning to real classroom circumstances.
Darling-Hammond (1998) advocates
learning situations like mentoring programs, extended graduate programs,
supervised internship programs, peer observations and coaching, study
groups, ongoing seminars, courses of study linked to practice, and school-university
partnerships. These new programs are intended to create a "professional
teacher as one who learns from teaching rather than as one who has finished
learning how to teach" (Darling-Hammond, 1998, p. 9). It is in
this ongoing learning that creates a teacher image that is professional,
one that emulates the internship of a doctor. Teachers must embody professionalism
in order for the role of teacher to be valued by the public.
In many schools, professional
development is seen as something that is done to teachers rather than
something that is done with teachers. Teachers need to get more involved
in their learning. Darling-Hammond (1998) encourages teachers to take
ownership of their learning by participating in groups that discuss,
review and evaluate educational research. Too often, teachers place
the blame inappropriately on students when they are unable to achieve
to the desired level; Darling-Hammond (1998) gives the ownership of
improved learning back to the teachers.
The strengths of this article
by Darling-Hammond (1998) are many; not only does it encourage teachers
to get back on the learning path, but it gives teachers examples of
how this learning environment can be created. The ideas are clearly
written and the points of importance are nicely bulleted for easy reference.
Leading researchers in the field of professional development and learning
theory supports this information. The author includes quotations and
stories by real teachers who have benefited from ongoing professional
development. The article gives hope to those who want to be better professionals
but do not know how to go from coping well to teaching well.
However, Darling- Hammond
(1998) does not emphasize enough the benefits that students gain by
having teachers who are participating in ongoing learning experiences.
The title of the article indicates that focus of the article would balance
between teacher learning and student learning. Unfortunately, it is
not until the very end of the article that Darling-Hammond (1998) attempts
to explain how students might benefit by the desired professional development
outlined for teachers. I believe that much more could have been written
to convince readers how teacher learning can support student learning.
Over the course of completing my Masters of Education, I have witnessed
first hand the positive changes in my teaching practice as well as the
positive changes in my students learning patterns. By reading
research and discussing issues with colleagues in the program, I have
learned the value of Multiple Intelligences and brain based teaching
practices. Because I am taking my courses while still teaching in the
classroom, I am able to try new things and become more instrumental
in the changes being made for the benefit of my students. I believe
that Darling-Hammond (1998) could have emphasized this important aspect
of the article more strongly for those readers who are still unconvinced
of the benefits of ongoing professional development.
Overall, this article by
Darling-Hammond (1998) presents teachers with a path to professionalism.
The author encourages teachers to practice what they preach: Never stop
learning. Students will benefit by having teachers who are willing to
become better professionals and by seeing role models that are committed
to learning. Teachers must become successful professionals who are actively
learning to teach to todays enormous challenges. When this happens,
society will no longer be having discussions about the competency of
teachers nor will students be finding themselves on the wrong side of
the door of education.
References
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher
learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership,
55, (5), 6 - 11.

|